Coffee is for Closers

tequilaBloggers Can’t Be Closers? Bloggers can be closers! Ergo Coffee is for Bloggers. I am getting myself a large coffee right now from Dagny’s. I am at Mesh, which is upstairs and next door to Dagny’s. It has fast WiFi and office space for start-ups, JavaScript coders, Venture Capitalists, and so forth and so on. They also have coffee. But I like Dagny’s coffee better, because they make it for you, and also because they have Ethiopian coffee.

I am on a journey through Ethiopia right now, reading The Sign and the Seal by Graham Hancock. In it he takes several trips to Ethiopia to try and find the Ark of the Covenant. The usual suspects show up, namely the Knights of Templar, the Masons, but also Solomon and the Queen of Sheba. Their son, Menelik, takes the Ark of the Covenant back to Ethiopia, where it remains to this day, or so the legend goes. Graham Hancock is like a real life Indiana Jones, and was even inspired by Raiders of the Lost Ark, albeit with more research and documentation, and less swashbuckling and Stetson/Fedoras. Graham Hancock is on Twitter, his handle is his first and last name connected with 2 underscores!
BRB. Getting that coffee, the Ethiopian coffee from Dagny’s. The cultural hub of the Bakersfield Universe.

So, anyway, here’s the proverbial thing: I just post stuff up on my blog that is my Joycean Stream-of-Consciousness, unfiltered, and am well aware of its flaws, faults, and shortcomings. If this was an article that I was submitting to a publication, then I might edit and rewrite it. I think it was Kelly Oxford who found that she got the most reaction from this kind of unfiltered and raw $#!+ which led to a book deal. I think she would be described as a humorist.

Laura Albert had great success purging and faxing her feelings to her therapist under the guise of her alter ego JT LeRoy. On the other hand, Gilbert Gottfried got himself fired from AFLAC but they still used his voice for the duck, they just have someone copy it and they do not pay him. And so it goes.

That is a saying from Kurt Vonnegut. I think it was from Cat’s Cradle, but don’t quote me on that. I liked a lot of his books as a teenager, but recently I read that he eschewed semicolons. Screw him. I know that Kurt has a lot of fans–but let me be blunt, if not curt–I don’t want to get into a pissing contest over Vonnegut, or David Foster Wallace, or Stephen King, or Cormack McCarthy, or any other writer you may or may not have read but have formed an opinion on. I am just saying that while Vonnegut may be a very good writer, I don’t agree with his semicolon policy. I think we should keep the punctuation marks we have, and master their proper use. To arbitrarily change the subject, there was a recently proposed moratorium on the dash, and I would support it–though not a complete ban, just a more circumspect and judicious use of it. Don’t get me started on italics. Actually, I don’t really use semicolons either, but I aspire to, and I am studying a writer who does in order to emulate him.

Which brings me to Lawrence Durrell, who I am currently reading. I am in the second book of his tetralogy, The Alexandria Quartet, namely Balthazar. He uses the dash and all other punctuation marks, as well as an extensive vocabulary, with literary and pop culture allusions in English and other languages–living and dead–galore. Though some may find it off-putting, this excessively florid prose style–I rather enjoy it. I read it like poetry, closer to music than prose or rhetoric. It has a certain musical rhythm that begs and prays to be read aloud–or at least heard in the mind’s ear–uninterrupted, without pause to interpret the literal meaning, what he is actually telling you.

Shakespeare works like this for me, too. I let it wash over me like it is being performed as a play, in spite of the arcane language and some words I might not know the precise definition of. It is enjoyable to just luxuriate in the sound of it, and let it form images in your mind like searching for shapes in clouds passing overhead. O, joy! Transcendent and splendid joy!

One comment on “Coffee is for Closers

  1. Vonnegut seems to be most appropriately read by the young. As for semicolons, I have mine irrigated twice annually. Or would ; that be anally: ? I;m aftraid that I am ; using too many; sometimes.

    See ya.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s